Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coimbatore–Bengaluru Cantonment Vande Bharat Express

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. T. Canens (talk) 02:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Coimbatore–Bengaluru Cantonment Vande Bharat Express (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NOTTIMETABLE and WP:NOTABILITY, content is more suitable in a railway information website. This is not done for other countries. Refer to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/New_Delhi%E2%80%93Kalka_Shatabdi_Express for more info.

I am also nominating the following articles for the same reason: (Many of these already have multiple issues and/or are stubs) BhandupAamche (talk) 12:32, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and India. BhandupAamche (talk) 12:32, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also WP:CITEBUNDLE BhandupAamche (talk) 12:34, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Keep:The nominator is using wrong notability guidelines. The article being a stub or having multiple issues are not proper reasons for AFD. The subject easily passes WP:GNG as it has multiple reliable sources. Thilsebatti (talk) 13:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  "Presumed" means that significant coverage in reliable sources creates an assumption, not a guarantee, that a subject merits its own article. A more in-depth discussion might conclude that the topic actually should not have a stand-alone article—perhaps because it violates what Wikipedia is not, particularly the rule that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.^[1]

  From WP:GNG. I believe it does violate WP:NOT. Arnav Bhate (talk) 14:58, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep NOTTIMETABLE is an essay, not a guideline, and the subject is clearly notable as it meets GNG with significant coverage in multiple sources. – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:57, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would advise you to withdraw this so that I can include it in the bundle and discussion can be kept at one place. Arnav Bhate (talk) 14:59, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Two things can be true - there can be elements of an article that need to be removed (the timetable bit) and the article can still be notable under the GNG. That is the case here. SportingFlyer T·C 15:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  What part of the article that is worth keeping is not in Vande Bharat Express or Vande Bharat (trainset)? Arnav Bhate (talk) 16:43, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  That doesn't matter - it passes WP:GNG so is notable as a stand-alone topic. I've removed the most obviously WP:NOTTRAVEL sections. SportingFlyer T·C 17:15, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @SportingFlyer, @Thilsebatti, @Arnav Bhate,

  If that's the case, then I'll remove those fields in all the "Soon to be deleted pages" and met the WP protocol. Is that fine? Sanjeev4125 (talk) 13:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes. I am removing anything related to coach composition, halts, timetable and speed except in the infoboxes. You can do the same. Arnav Bhate (talk) 13:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Arnav Bhate,

  Ok I'll get those done. After that will that notice be removed?? Sanjeev4125 (talk) 01:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  The notice will be removed when the discussion is closed. This is usually done 7 days after it has been started. Arnav Bhate (talk) 07:59, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  OK @Arnav Bhate. The edits which I've performed, let me know if any other to be removed. Sanjeev4125 (talk) 10:02, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Schedule = Timetable also has to be removed. I'll remove it now from all Vande Bharat articles so you don't have to edit them, but if you find it in any other article then you should remove it. Also, this page is on my watchlist so you don't have to ping me everytime. Arnav Bhate (talk) 10:35, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.