Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coca-Cola Groups

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – Robert 20:26, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Original research (see WP:NOR), unverifiable (see WP:V). Chick Bowen 01:40, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, nonsensical. Gazpacho 01:46, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, agree with GazpachoTheRingess 01:48, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Someone had one too many. -- JJay 01:55, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. The votes and the nomination itself were removed by User:LSEditor and replaced with this text:"Keep this page. It is great for those looking in to this fast growing cult in Sudbury." Please do not edit other people's votes on AfD. Chick Bowen 02:11, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. This has occurred yet again. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 00:41, Dec. 16, 2005

I Have updated it and cleaned it up. I think it is ready to go. I have showed it to the democraphic it is supposed to see it and they agree with its facts and would like it to stay up.

I have actually gotten a member of the group to look at it and make sure it is factually correct. He has and I feel becaue he is the leader of one that it must be up now.

I will continue to add more info as I find it in already written readings. This is not my own research. I have read a few books written by people from the cult on this.

• Keep Just because you people do not know about this cult does not mean you should limit others from seeing it. LSEditor 04:13, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. LSEditor, its not that we're trying to prevent others from finding out about this - please see WP:NOR, WP:V, and perhaps that will help. KillerChihuahua^?!? 04:39, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. This is the second time I have had to post this vote. LSEditor, please refrain from deleting other users votes. Movementarian 04:58, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom,  J\/\/estbrook       05:10, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Also, LSEditor, creating Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mário de Andrade does not help your argument. See WP:POINT. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:26, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Essentially unverifiable, possible hoax. Capitalistroadster 06:50, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• BTW, mine was one of the votes lost. Capitalistroadster 06:51, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or rewrite to be able the different types of Coca-Cola related companies - Fanta, Sprite etc. That's what I thought that this was about. This group is totally non-notable. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 07:22, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Those aren't companies. They are brand names of products manufactured by the company. Uncle G 19:47, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom unless good verifiable source citations for the existence and importance of these groups is provided forthwith. Dpbsmith (talk) 14:10, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a bad joke. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 16:12, Dec. 15, 2005
• Delete as complete bollocks. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 17:01, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete (second time vote). Pavel Vozenilek 17:07, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this looks hoax-ish to me. CarbonCopy (talk) 17:32, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete Somewhere between a dumb joke and an ad. Jasmol 21:42, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.