Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clig (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 06:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clig

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has no references and has hardly been touched since 2006. There are 3 external links: 2 are archived links of primary sources from 2006 which have since been deleted or moved, and 1 no longer works. A Google search reveals little other information besides incidental mentions and text apparently recycled from the Wikipedia article itself. Rublov (talk) 01:18, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Rublov (talk) 01:18, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:32, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The 2006 AfD was withdrawn but I don't see the links added during that discussion as sufficient for current notability standards or those suggested in the WP:NSOFT essay, nor are my searches finding better than occasional brief listings. AllyD (talk) 14:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.