Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clifton House Preparatory School

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of 04:10, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clifton House Preparatory School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a private primary/elementary school and such schools need at least a distinctive feature or good coverage in RS to have any prospect to be considered notable. This school has no such feature or coverage and fails WP:ORG. Delete. Just Chilling (talk) 22:32, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:38, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:38, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:38, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
For information:-"CLIFTON HOUSE SCHOOL". www.aeden.plus.com. Retrieved 3 March 2019.: is one reference but not RS. ClemRutter (talk) 12:43, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I would normally agree. However, it is not mentioned there and a redirect to an article where it is not mentioned is bad practice since it would simply be annoying to the reader. That section lists notable secondary schools so adding it there would be inappropriate. Just Chilling (talk) 21:05, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • I agree with you in that case we shouldn't generally redirect to a page where the topic isn't covered. Unless we normally cover preparatory schools in sections large towns then it should be deleted. We obviously do this for villages but this is more difficult for large towns since its more likely to overload the article. I still think mentioning it in the education section may be viable though. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:20, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:01, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The list of schools articles are just that, simply a list, all of the English ones were reduced to this previously (see for example). Personally I think that the lists should be more informative and at least give basic details for each entry as most of them would be classed as non-notable. You can then have a redirect to the list or an article for each entry. Keith D (talk) 15:07, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.