Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clásico Yoreño

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:06, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clásico Yoreño

Clásico Yoreño (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The two teams have only met each other twice in professional football. I'm assuming that they are geographically near each other but, still, this doesn't mean that an article is required. I can't see how WP:NRIVALRY can possibly be met. Spiderone 11:58, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:08, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:08, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:09, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 12:14, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 12:46, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect - to C.D. Social Sol JohnTombs48 (talk) 19:55, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails WP:NRIVALRY, no evidence of sufficient coverage of the notion of a "rivalry" not just match reporting of individual games, to indicate GNG. Redirect comment above obviously nonsensical, why would you direct to one team, not the other. Fenix down (talk) 13:39, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no evidence of notability. Eldumpo (talk) 21:57, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.