Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CipherCloud

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:38, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CipherCloud

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional article on small company--the sources are PR, or mere notices 'DGG (at NYPL) (talk) 18:15, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support deletion. A small company, notable only for the misleading claims it has made about its products. Not that that makes a company notable anyway. Maproom (talk) 22:57, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support deletion. Page appears to be purely used for marketing purposes --Mikefromnyc (talk) 16:39, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.