Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cindy Pucci (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^{talk to me} 03:52, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cindy Pucci

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I hate nominating an article for deletion a second time, but I'm afraid I'm just not seeing what makes this person notable. I see an interview with her at Glamourcon and a blurb about an upcoming project on AVN, but I don't see any significant discussion anywhere of her career as a model, an actress, or a porn actress. My opinion is that the sources cited don't really rise to the level of WP:RS, and I'm not finding better sources using Google news. But if you disagree, I'll still like you. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:31, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The last AfD indicated that WP:PORNBIO was not met, and I find no indication that that has changed; I do not think that the other appearances are sufficient per the general notability guideline. The sources, interviews, and appearances are completely consistent with a minor figure in a PR-dependent industry, and do not indicate notability at this time. As the subject is a living person, future sources may reverse this assessment. - 2/0 (cont.) 22:59, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The subject meets a common interpretation of PORNBIO#4, that any combination of mainstream credits and porn credits demonstrates notability. Time to put that to rest for good. Subject has negligible credits in both fields and fails the GNG. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:15, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I couldn't find any decent sources which can be used to demonstrate notability or used to fill a bio with independently verified info. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 08:11, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Pornbio #4 says "Has been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media." She has one 2nd billing in a direct-to-video of hidden camera skits. After that it is a slew of low-or-no-billing in other DTV and made-for-tv flicks. There is nothing here to satisfy any of our notability criteria. Tarc (talk) 13:23, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is Cindy Pucci. Please delete this!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cindypucci (talk • contribs) 04:04, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.