Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cindy Kovalak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:50, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cindy Kovalak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

notable and sensitive cause (human trafficking), but being a civil servant with RCMP working for the cause doesn't make her notable Hwy43 (talk) 07:13, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Hwy43 (talk) 07:22, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hwy43 (talk) 07:29, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete One of a group of WP:UNDUE articles by the same editor, full of items such as "she appeared on a panel in conjunction with a screening" and incidental items like who they like etc. This article is not isolated in its over-cited trivial-content nature. Probably superfluous wikiprojects on e.g. human trafficking have been added, even though this person is not a notable anti-human trafficking activist nor are human trafficker or traffickee. Some remain because they hold beauty pageant titles, but their articles are similarly full of unencyclopedic dross, and serve as demonstrations that WP:RS can be abused to create articles on non-notable subjects.Skookum1 (talk) 10:09, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Few if any hits from google search, incl scholar and books. Article does not appear to make claim to notability beyond public appearances or statements that are a normal part of her employment.Canuckle (talk) 04:10, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.