Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cindy Fulsom
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 13:35, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cindy Fulsom
- Cindy Fulsom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No reliable sources, and doesn't pass the criteria at WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 00:46, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per nom. Fails WP:PORNBIO. ~Beano~ (talk) (contribs) 16:18, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:36, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:51, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:52, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:52, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails these criteria, and not notable...why are there so many porn articles? DavidWS (contribs) 14:20, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I couldn't find anything that passed WP:PORNBIO --Banime (talk) 15:20, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above, Tabercil (talk) 20:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:PORNBIO. Tatarian (talk) 20:52, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.