Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronic Logic

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 06:53, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chronic Logic

Chronic Logic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A seemingly non-notable company that fails WP:GNG/WP:NCORP. Checking WP:VG/RS, the company is mentioned in WP:PASSING in a small handful of sources, but there is nothing akin to significant coverage. The only thing that mentions the name twice is this interview, which is mostly about Alex Austin and as an interview also would not count towards notability. Don't be fooled by the many GamesIndustry.biz and GameZone articles, they are all press releases. IceWelder [] 09:36, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. IceWelder [] 09:36, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. IceWelder [] 09:36, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete — I created this article as a stub in 2006 (something I was quite surprised to learn just now), and now it's ... still a stub? Another consideration: I do not see that deleting it would remove any value from the two articles it links to (Gish and Zatikon). CWC 11:17, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, all I was able to find was a press release in GamesIndustry.biz [1] and passing mentions. Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:22, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.