Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christy Canyon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW. Nonadmin close. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 12:33, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Christy Canyon

Procedural nomination; nomination was broken and stuck at the top of the page. Reason given was: "obscure porno actress, NOT notable even within world of porno, NPOV, self-promotion, advertisement,." Celarnor ^{Talk to me} 04:15, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. With the numerous awards, I think there's enough to assert the notability of the subject. Celarnor ^{Talk to me} 04:17, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, one of the biggest names of her era. A number of the key notability claims are sourced (although as with many articles it could use improvement). ~~Likely a bad faith nomination based on the wording.~~ --Dhartung | Talk 06:16, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Based on this and this (the nominator's only edits other than the one to the AFD log page), this seems to be a new user's severe misunderstanding of WP:N. There may be just a tinge of WP:POINT in the edits, though, but it's hard to prove. --Dhartung | Talk 06:21, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. This is probably the most ridiculous AfD I've ever seen, and I've seen plenty of doozies. Notability is not disputed here, only the lack of references -- which is a reason to improve the article, not delete it. Strong pointiness suspected. Xihr (talk) 06:43, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The only reason I hesitate is that the nom was so mal-formed. I'd expect someone who just went through a contrary AFD to have a better idea how to set it up or to make more effort to get it started right. --Dhartung | Talk 07:52, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:28, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:N. Google News and Google Books searches indicate plenty of sustained non-trivial WP:RS coverage to meet general notability. She also passes WP:PORNBIO with the references already present as a member of both major U.S. porn Halls of Fame and winner of well-known awards. Whatever notability issues provoked this nom appear to be fixable. • Gene93k (talk) 07:58, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. One of the most notable porn stars. Sources, AVN Hall of Fame, etc. Epbr123 (talk) 08:17, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. In the AVN hall of fame, Lots of sources to use for article expansion, Still active in the industry even though not in a performing sense through Playboy Radio, many TV appearances and relation to mainstream. Easily a keep in my view. Steve355 (talk) 09:50, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep and Close This actress is definitely notable according to all our policies and guidelines on the subject. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:23, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.