Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher To
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 06:30, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Christopher To (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable individual lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Conflict of interest, no third party sources. Appears to fail WP:BIO. reddogsix (talk) 10:53, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - appears to be promotional by an editor with a COI, not notable. GregJackP Boomer! 11:29, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:31, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unclear notability, poor sourcing, conflict of interest. I'm surprised the article creator hasn't been blocked yet. Hairhorn (talk) 17:22, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.