Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Banahan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:30, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Banahan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He's clearly successful, but I couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn (talk) 19:50, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I don't see what criteria of WP:ARTIST he fulfills. The source for many of his "honors" and "exhibitions" is his own CV from his own website, which of course doesn't constitute an independent source. Ravenswing 22:20, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - I would be kind enough to say not notable enough yet, he has only one painting at most in a public collection and there's little online news coverage about him and his work. The best I could find were some brief mentions in his local paper. He makes no great claim to notability himself. Sionk (talk) 00:27, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.