Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Weston Chandler
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
 | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2012 December 20. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 22:46, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Christian Weston Chandler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Highly frenetic (talk) 21:28, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom. A Google search on the subject doesn't bring up reliable sources, anyway. Whip it! Now whip it good! 21:43, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Subject does not pass WP:BIO at this time. --ThaddeusB (talk) 22:01, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article doesn't meet our standards of notability for biographies; not mentioned in any reliable, third party sources. tempodivalse [☎] 23:47, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: there seems to be some related mucking about on the articles Chris Chan Lee ([1]) and Jimmy Hill ([2]). — sjorford++ 09:02, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Trolls have done similar vandalism on the Notable Cherokees page (either that or a similar page) by adding Chris, who claims Cherokee ancestry. --Champthom (talk) 13:02, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:09, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - even so, being mentioned on some blog as "a future republican congressman" is not his only notability credentials. --Phil1988 (talk) 06:13, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I troll Chris but I admit, none of the current stuff on Chris really meets Wikipedia standards (NPOV or lack thereof, anyone?). Really, mostly EDiots like myself who generate this stuff. --Champthom (talk) 22:52, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.