Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Social Party of Peru

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Discussion regarding merger can take place on talk page. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:50, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Social Party of Peru

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Not notability claimed and this is a duplication of Christian Social Party (Peru). UnrepentantTaco (talk) 21:00, 15 June 2013 (UTC)~~ [Edit reverted as per WP:BE and [1]. Unscintillating (talk) 19:47, 23 June 2013 (UTC)][reply]

Merge - Clearly a fork. I'm in favor of the lowest of all possible bars to notability for articles on political parties, their leaders, and their youth sections without regard to ideology. Partido Social Cristiano del Perú seems the formal name of the organization. I've seen sources for 1945 and 1946 for date of origin, seemingly a bigger organization in Ecuador than Peru, I think I saw... Seems to have had the name revitalized in recent years. Needs more sussing out, but this should be a GNG pass even if my IAR-based rationale doesn't fly. Carrite (talk) 22:04, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:12, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:12, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:12, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I'll to to source the article better in coming days. However, The Christian Social Party (Peru) and Christian Social Party of Peru were two separate parties, and the AfDs should be treated separately. --Soman (talk) 03:54, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - National political parties are notable. Passes GNG. Nom took this Straight to AfD without a PROD. One of several disruptive AfDs by the same nominator. Dolovis (talk) 02:30, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
keep or merge and redirect not being familiar enough with the area, it looks like they might be two separate parties with similar names. if so, keep both. if not, merge and redirect.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:21, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close, speedy keep: The nominator was blocked as of 06:52, 21 June 2013 for sock puppetry per a discussion "Disruptive creation of groundless AFDs, probable sockpuppetry". Crtew (talk) 16:24, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SK 2a The closer should keep in mind the large number of nominations made on a large, diverse set of articles that the nominator made on the same day.Crtew (talk) 05:31, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.