Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Orion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 08:55, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Orion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:GNG - nothing more than a local radio personality. I'm actually not even convinced that the one reference listed is even about the subject. Jmertel23 (talk) 00:24, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Jmertel23 (talk) 00:24, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 00:41, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 00:41, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - No indication of notability. NickCT (talk) 00:53, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Zero third-party coverage. And yep, the only "source" therein was completely unrelated to the subject. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 03:01, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The article describes him as an "amateur American radio personality", which is a synonym for "not notable", unless there exists powerful evidence to the contrary. My careful Google search reveals no such evidence. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:25, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable amateur radio personality. Completely fails WP:GNG. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 06:30, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: No secondary sources in the article. Can't even seem to find one either. _SUPER ^ASTIG 00:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.