Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Mason (journalist) (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ミラP 16:42, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Mason (journalist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted as not meeting WP:JOURNALIST; there are a few new sources in this version but they seem trivial. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:36, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:37, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:37, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:37, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:37, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
But do the sources show notability? IlluminatingTrooper (talk) 02:29, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:ILIKEIT that is not an argument to show why it should be kept. Please discount the above vote closers. IlluminatingTrooper (talk) 02:29, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - two of the sources in the article are interviews, which are primary sources - the rest of the references are run-of-the-mill for someone on TV - there is no in depth coverage of Mason himself - has not won any awards or made a widely recognized contribution per WP:ANYBIO - has not received significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources per WP:BASIC - just having a job with the BBC is not in itself notable - Epinoia (talk) 04:20, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep ... Major political journalist who will be even more significant — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.2.22.134 (talk) 03:00, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Amakuru (talk) 13:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 14:30, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The washington post source does discuss him a little, not a lot, but it is barely enough to be significant. All the rest are either interviews with him or otherwise insignificant. Rockphed (talk) 15:01, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Other news media, in Britain and internationally (US, France, Ireland so far), have reported on his reports - particularly about the Mr Blobby quote, but the Express and the Evening Standard have reported about him on other occasions too. An academic study of tweets by "seasoned UK political correspondents" included Mason as one of its 10 subjects. This is not a regional news broadcaster - he reports on national news about major political events, and receives attention from other news media for doing so. I have added some sources and info to the article, and will look for more. I note that some of the sources include interviews, but they also have information about Mason, so should not be rejected entirely. RebeccaGreen (talk) 10:46, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Ridiculous suggestion to delete. He's frequently on the BBC and is therefore well-known and notable. If the article lacks sources then go and find some! 31.52.161.37 (talk) 22:19, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Rillington.4meter4 (talk) 19:28, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep He is a political journalist who is regularly making quality broadcasts on BBC News. He was one of the founders of Brexitcast where the other founders are on Wikipedia. He would not be that well known outside Europe <BBC>. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UKpoliticaljunkie (talkcontribs) 20:00, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.