Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Hamer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:17, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Hamer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC. Except a passing mention on foxbusiness.com, the sources are either primary or closely related to the subject (fairfield.edu). The article was created by an WP:SPA. See also: CrowdFlik. Rentier (talk) 02:42, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 03:19, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per the reasons listed above by Rentier. I should also mention that the credible claim of significance for the subject made within the article seems predicated on the notability of CrowdFlik, an article which was also created by the same single purpose account. Additionally, as it is currently written, the article appears to read like a resume: Wikipedia is not LinkedIn. --Erick Shepherd (talk) 09:51, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as still not convincing of solid independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 04:53, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. VanEman (talk) 22:26, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.