Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chowkidekhi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was move to Draft:Chowkidekhi. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:23, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chowkidekhi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE. May be a good idea to merge, also. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 16:45, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 16:45, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - It appears to be equivalent to a Mahallah, per this source from Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, officially divided into two Purba (East) and Pashchim (West) Chowkidekhi. Google search does provide widespread mentions. Pinging @UserNumber: to clarify as he is more knowledgeable about Sylhet-related affairs. --Zayeem ^(talk) 19:06, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Move - Although it is a very historically relevant area, I am not currently planning to work on Chowkidekhi at the moment. It could be moved to a draft for now, and once I have time I shall add more information (with sources) about Chowkidekhi. UserNumber (talk) 13:57, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:57, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Draftify Per the comment above this by the creator of the article who wishes to work on it more when they have the time. Plus, it seems like there are sources out there about it. So, I see no reason not to. If it just duplicates another article or whatever can be decided later once it's in a state to go back to the main article space. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:43, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.