Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chowilla Dam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Result was keep. Non-admin closure. Nominator withdrew and this article meets or exceeds WP:GNG with significant independent reliable sources. Many dams, such as the Franklin and Rampart, as well as those in Category:Cancelled dams, are notable. The Chowilla Dam was a large dam with a controversy on the regional/national level. As such, its story and impact should be included in this encyclopedia.--NortyNort (Holla) 22:06, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chowilla Dam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

About a dam that was never built. ThisGuyIsGreat (talk) 00:51, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 01:12, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Major, major political controversy of its time. It determined the rise and fall of Steele Hall as Premier of South Australia and began the second stint of Don Dunstan. There are a huge amount of sources on it and it's a topic capable of being got to featured status. The Drover's Wife (talk) 01:43, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Rampart Dam is an example of a Featured Article about an American dam that was not built at about the same time as Chowilla. --Scott Davis ^Talk 02:29, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, no valid reason stated for deletion. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:02, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (as article creator) I was surprised to not find an article about this already, so set about creating a short article to expand on, and chose to start from the geographic and infrastructure aspects, not the political ones, as that is what I am more familiar with editing. The use, distribution and access to Murray River basin water has been (and continues to be) a contentious issue between the Commonwealth, four states and the ACT governments. Chowilla was a significant episode in that saga. Chowilla Dam is quite possibly more notable because it was not built than it would be if it had been. --Scott Davis ^Talk 02:24, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there is a precedent in Franklin Dam, also a dam that was never built. Also, I have a stash of material about this particular subject which I was going to use to write a similar article but can use here on this article Cowdy001 (talk) 05:35, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:16, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I created this report, under looking at it closely, I believe this should be kept. ThisGuyIsGreat (talk) 21:20, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.