Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chowdhary Rabiya Shafiq

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:28, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chowdhary Rabiya Shafiq (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial, in-depth support. reddogsix (talk) 06:02, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment- Chowdhary Rabiya Shafiq represents a real person. She is known by the ‘Fitst Female Journalist’ of district Rajouri in ‘Jammu & Kashmir’ state of India. She is a social activist and works with an NGO namely AAJAAR as District Volunteer Head. She hails from one of the backward districts of the state but she is working for the upliftment of the people living in those backward rural areas. She played a lead role in a short film titled ‘The Hair Maze’.106.192.51.251 (talk) 13:24, 12 February 2018 (UTC)Shoaib — 106.192.51.251 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

• Comment - Please demonstrate how this establishes notability. (Hint... read the guideline.) reddogsix (talk) 15:52, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Question Shoaib tantray111 (I'll assume that the first comment was from you given your habit of tagging pages with Shoaib), could you explain your connection with Chowdhary Rabiya Shafiq? She started an autobiography at Draft:Chowdhary Rabiya Shafiq and you seem to have returned after a 10 month long absence to create the article for her. What's the connection - are you a cat's paw, a meatpuppet, or were you paid to get her bio on the wiki which she was unable to do herself? Cabayi (talk) 23:05, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 23:06, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cabayi I wasn’t expecting this from Wikipedia community. End of discussion. Shoaib tantray111 (talk) 06:12, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @Shoaib tantray111 - Cabayi politely asks a valid question, yet, you fail to answer with a yes or no. Makes me ask the same question. Is there any connection between you and the subject of the article? reddogsix (talk) 06:32, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non-notable individual, no significant coverage in independent reliable sources and definitely a case of COI. GSS (talk|c|em) 14:17, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

reddogsix NO Shoaib tantray111 (talk) 15:39, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete non notable person. Fails WP:NBIO --Hagennos ❯❯❯ Talk 02:19, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:31, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:31, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:31, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as I do not see any particular claim to notability. A journalist is notable due to the impact of their reporting which will generally garner some awards. That seems to be missing here. The "first female journalist from xxx" is a vague title and unless there is adequate coverage, I don't see it as a reason for notability. For acting credits in a movie, it needs to be shown that the movie itself was notable. Perhaps the person might become notable someday in the future, but as of now today I don't think it fulfils the notability criteria.--DreamLinker (talk) 09:41, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.