Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chitram Bhalare Vichitram

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 19:07, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chitram Bhalare Vichitram

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NOTFILM, does not meet WP:SIGCOV, Found no hits on Google, only music and video download sites Wikishagnik (talk) 20:15, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Telugu sources: (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 21:49, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Too hard to verify, deletion is not permanent and per nom. Close and move on. Lots of work to do here. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 22:13, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The Imdb listing is enough for verifiability of a film--though of course it is not enough for notability of a BLP. DGG ( talk ) 04:33, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in agreement with DGG. It should be further noted that the internet is decidely unhelpful for early 1990s Indian / Telugu films. What we need is input from Telugu Wikipedians who may have access to hardcopy sources for this film released and screened twenty years ago. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 20:03, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete pretty borderline. With foreign-language material such as this, the first place I look is the native-language wikipedia (which is likely to have better content / refs), but in this case there isn't one. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:55, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not contain references to reliable sources that would make the subject notable per WP:GNG; IMDB is not a reliable source. Sandstein 12:02, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.