Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinglonesian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:42, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chinglonesian

A Google search on 'Chinglonesian -wikipedia' only has 10 results, some of which are just copies of this article. So it seems to be both non-notable and not verifiable by reliable sources. Marcoscramer (talk) 01:12, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- RayAYang (talk) 01:15, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete appears to be a case of WP:NEO per web search; nothing in Google books or scholar either. JJL (talk) 01:42, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of proof that this is a real word. I think I'm getting Chinglonauseous. Mandsford (talk) 03:06, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - it really needs sources. - Richard Cavell (talk) 07:50, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Either a protologism, or a non-word. — neuro^(talk) 09:33, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.