Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chindonesia

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:22, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chindonesia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable phrase/neologism. Practically no sources can be found that actually use this phrase. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 08:43, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 09:06, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 09:06, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 09:06, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 09:06, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete Apart from the uncompelling sources in the article it seems to be mostly used in finance for one or more investment schemes. So a barely used neologism.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 09:47, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete It appears as if the word was created by an investment fund to entice investors in the region, and while there are some good references that use the term (Economist, Financial Times), they all appear to be in relation to the investment scheme, or an investment scheme. Only three of five references actually use the phrase, and one is a dictionary. SportingFlyer talk 04:53, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.