Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China Gerui Advanced Materials Group Ltd.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

China Gerui Advanced Materials Group Ltd.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

- fails WP:CORP as there are no reliable secondary sources cited in the article. - Only refers to self published sources, own website, reeks of promotion has also been tagged but issues haven't ben addressed since 2013. ronaz ^Talk! 10:58, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 (Happy Thanksgiving!) 15:53, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. —MRD2014 (Happy Thanksgiving!) 15:53, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. —MRD2014 (Happy Thanksgiving!) 15:53, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as blatant advertising and the fact there's nothing but an overfocus with exactly that, it shows that's literally the best that exists especially since it's clear this was company-motivated, so they would naturally only include anything that in fact existed about this. SwisterTwister talk 00:40, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:28, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- this could be notable as a listed company, but the content is 100% spam and should be TNTed asap. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.