Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children of a Dead Earth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  JGHowes  ^talk 02:09, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Children of a Dead Earth

Children of a Dead Earth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, lack of in-depth coverage in reliable secondary sources. Current sourcing is unreliable blogs or primary sources. Zero relevant hits in WP:VG/RS's custom searches. MetaCritic has 0 registered critic reviews. -- ferret (talk) 23:12, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. -- ferret (talk) 23:12, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails Wikipedia standards for notability._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 01:12, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. There is one review on Pelit and a passing mention on RPS (plus another mention on GamesRadar+, but that appears to be about a novel series rather than the game). However, these do not make for notability. IceWelder [✉] 10:07, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not enough RS of a good enough standard. Deathlibrarian (talk) 11:10, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 16:08, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. benǝʇᴉɯ 18:41, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Does not pass the minimum criteria for WP:SIGCOV. Non-notable video game. --Wario-Man (talk) 13:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 January 17. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:48, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete An extensive Google search brings up no SIGCOV Or RS . So clearly fails WP:GNG . Kpgjhpjm 12:48, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.