Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chartered Institute of Arbitrators
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep/withdrawn by nominator DavidLeighEllis (talk) 17:08, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails GNG -- unable to find significant RS coverage. [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 16:18, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:58, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:58, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I have added various references. I think there is enough to establish that this organisation, operating under Royal Charter and mentioned in a key piece of UK financial conduct legislation, as well as its international dimension, meets WP:ORGDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 09:37, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, nice deal of source coverage here. — Cirt (talk) 22:39, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- This a riduculous nomination. This professional body is establsihed by Royal Charter, something that is no given lightly, and has existed for nearly a century. Having a Royal Charter should be enough to make it notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:44, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Rescind nomination much improved article, thanks. -- [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 22:45, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.