Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Catania

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:43, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Catania

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability; sources are either press releases or passing mentions that do not cover Catania in any detail. Was prodded for that reason, prod removed without improvement. Huon (talk) 23:11, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:MILL and WP:POLITICIAN. We are not a web host for political consultants. There are about 530 campaigns for congress and senate every two years; by definition, more than half of which will lose. Being a campaign manager of such a campaign does not magically grant notability, and is, in fact, for the most part totally mundane. For a campaign manager to get notability, we've had a very high standard. Bearian (talk) 17:46, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:50, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:50, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:50, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:50, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:51, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I found some links but certainly not enough to suggest better improvement and notability. SwisterTwister talk 07:31, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Both - searches didn't turn up anything to show they pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:11, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.