Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Asprey (publisher)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Asprey (publisher)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Well, her we go again. 3rd or 4th time for puff-piece UPE. NO coverage. Refs are passing mentions, PR, event listing, catalogue entries. scope_creep^Talk 23:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree totally with nom. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and United Kingdom. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:50, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with nominator. NMasiha (talk) 20:03, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG and WP:MILL. There's zero evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources. This appears to be a run of the mill curator and art book publisher. Bearian (talk) 16:57, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment scope_creep, where do we find the history of the previous versions please? Maybe salting is worthwhile here. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:27, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MrsSnoozyTurtle: I couldn't tell you. It is thing with these folk that are desperate to get the article on WP. I've seen this at least twice in the last decade. This article has been sitting here since 2016, and I think that is probably when the previous one was deleted. It is the name and face for me. The name and the face are very distinctive. It will be back for sure. scope_creep^Talk 22:43, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.