Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaordic organization

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 02:30, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chaordic organization (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. References seems to mostly come back to the book written by Dee Hock. Seems promotional. Imcdc (talk) 02:18, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 02:18, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as a non-notable WP:NEOLOGISM. I would suggest redirecting to Dee Hock but I can't imagine anyone searching for this. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 01:06, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.