Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chantelle Nicholson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 17:12, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chantelle Nicholson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo article for a non notable chef that fails WP:BIO/WP:BASIC/WP:GNG. References in article doesn’t even mention subject of the article Celestina007 (talk) 17:06, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:06, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:06, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:35, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:53, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: notable chef. I don't understand "References in article doesn’t even mention subject of the article" above: refs 1-7 certainly do, one being a major profile in Evening Standard. Awards,books coauthored, etc. PamD 12:03, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Have expanded the content about her books, with review/interview in The Observer adding to her notability. PamD 12:51, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Article in its current form demonstrates general notability. Schwede 66 14:13, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY due to good work by PamD. Bearian (talk) 16:36, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.