Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Change (company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Per Keep arguments. Clear consensus against deletion per NCORP and, thus, for keeping the page. The author may expand it though to reflect the impact on the industry. (non-admin closure) Old-AgedKid (talk) 14:58, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change (company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to meet WP:NCORP, mainly press releases as sources. PhotographyEdits (talk) 14:22, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. PhotographyEdits (talk) 14:22, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Netherlands. – The Grid (talk) 14:28, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:57, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep the Estonian media coverage, particularly in highly reliable sources such as the national newspaper Äripäev, provides substantial and in-depth reporting that firmly establishes the company notability. The coverage is not superficial however sometimes paywalled. --حجر الكريستال (talk) 12:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: حجر الكريستال (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. [reply]
• Keep per the reliable sources present in the page - they are in local language but their significant coverage pretty obviously satisfies NCORP. Prone to fails (talk) 14:07, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment as nom. The article basically doesn't talk about what makes the subject notable, just things that any run of the mill company does: having founders, moving headquarters, getting investments. Some WP:TNT might be needed here. PhotographyEdits (talk) 20:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep because it provides significant information about a notable company that has made a meaningful impact in its industry, supported by reliable Estonian sources --Jiaoriballisse (talk) 14:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I have learned nothing about the impact of the platform in the article. I know it is a brokerage platform, that's it. PhotographyEdits (talk) 09:29, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• keep passes GNG with those sources and more sources exist. Pelmeen10 (talk) 11:24, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep that meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for organizations and cover valuable information of financial technology companies. --Jiaoriballisse (talk) 10:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  You already voted, please don't vote multiple times. PhotographyEdits (talk) 11:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.