Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandrashekar Kupperi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:33, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chandrashekar Kupperi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not meet wiki:notability , nowhere the source says nor discuss why the subject is notable, award claims to be frevilious without reference , also no quality references Shrikanthv (talk) 09:03, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:01, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:01, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as there are simply no signs of improvement here. SwisterTwister talk 06:20, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete notability unclear. --Oscarthecat (talk) 19:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I am updating some more references so we can wait for some more updates.--Samudurai 23:36, 29 September 2015 (IST)
• Keep Started improving this article by removing details which is not having proper reference. will add some more details with proper notable reference. Rajmar talk 12:32, 30 September 2015 (IST)
• Delete NO reliable sources within or for the finding, linking to a letter's to the editor type contribution in The Hindu city supplement Metro Plus or contribution on The Hindu Business Line 's college campus blog is obviously not something that would contribute to significant coverage. —SpacemanSpiff 07:21, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 19:22, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.