Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandgi Ram Real Estate Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 13:55, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chandgi Ram Real Estate Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Other than existing and performing their function I'm not clear on what is notable or significant about this company; also seems mildly promotional. 331dot (talk) 11:30, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Article is brand new, give it a chance to develop. It is tiring to see an article we know nothing about being nominated for deletion the same day it is created. It is a company that may have much more notability but is highly unlikely any research was done before nominating to delete. It is not some trivial pop culture article. So for being nominated out ignorance I say Keep. 172.56.7.197 (talk) 11:47, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(edit confl) The sources offered are just press release-style entries and profiles(including the company's own profile). If you can explain what is notable or significant about this company other than its existence(even without yet putting it in the article) I will withdraw this request. I think it merited speedy deletion but you removed it. You also don't know what I did and didn't do so please don't assume. 331dot (talk) 11:54, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article sourced to primary sources consisting largely of a flow of PRspeak windiness: "found himself amidst a land filled with promises of a future that could only be described by the dreams waiting to be realized on it ... the aim of turning dreams into reality ... transparent and result oriented ... a synonym of trust and a one stop solution". Such prose comes close to CSD G11. That could be fixed by article surgery but my searches are not showing evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 11:52, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete An article about a non-notable estate agents full of flowery PR rhetoric, most of which is wholly promotional and plagiarised from somewhere like this. Bellerophon _{talk to me} 15:51, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete: Promotional, no reliable sources does not meet WP:CORP or WP:GNG.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 20:41, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as clearly promo, Yellow Pages (or the equivalent there) is thataway →. –Davey2010^Talk 21:45, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per others above--this is clearly a promotional article. BenLinus 1214^talk 02:48, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Promotional article Fails WP:CORP. Lakun.patra (talk) 04:48, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.