Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chand Singh (soldier)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:02, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chand Singh (soldier)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Before anything else, I am thankful and In my opinion the subject has more than significant contribution to the country and the army. But it does not simply follows WP:SOLDIER. He was awarded the second highest honor only (Maha Vir Chakra) (not multiple times), not the highest honor that is Param Vir Chakra. Zoodino (talk) 17:07, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Zoodino (talk) 17:07, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Zoodino (talk) 17:11, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 03:09, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete single award of a second-level gallantry award does not meet WP:SOLDIER. A Google Books search doesn't indicate significant coverage in reliable secondary sources to meet WP:GNG. Honourpoint isn't RS. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:44, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG, definetely doesn't meet WP:NSOLDIER based upon his award. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.