Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaitali Das

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 04:50, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chaitali Das

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

OK so the managing trustee of some non-notable entity called Rakshak Foundation (page was speedy deleted a few days ago).. the subject has received some namecheck type of press coverage and nothing substantial at all so fails to meet GNG. Also received an Award from Women Economic Forum (page redirects to some other entity) so I assume the award is remotely notable.

Merely having some namechecks type of press coverage (given their abundance, these days) does not makes one notable enough to merit a standalone entry on WP. GNG states we require "Significant coverage which addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention". & I am afraid based on the available coverage, we cannot curate a proper BLP at the moment. for what its worth, article has some OR, already. Saqib (talk) 15:30, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. L293D (☎ • ✎) 15:45, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. L293D (☎ • ✎) 15:45, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Hi Saqib please check following references she has been mentioned in many reliable news media like Thestatesman, Telegraphindia most of references are intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject so page fulfill WP:BASIC and she has significant award for her social work by "Women Economic Forum". WEF awards woman's for their contribution in societal upliftment in India so her page fulfill WP:ANYBIO criteria. I was wondering, why did you flag her page just because Rakshak Foundation page was speedy deleted?? so dear this does not make this page to get delete so i request you kindly check again all references properly if you have any suggestion thy will be welcome but if still you have any other Q. to ask me feel free to ask.

Peakat (talk) 14:02, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. - GretLomborg (talk) 18:50, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment GretLomborg Kindly check page and references properly and explain a valid reason saying "per nom." is not enough Peakat (talk) 14:02, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete : a couple of fleeting mentions in the Telegraph is about as good as it gets; this is unfortunately insufficiently in-depth or persistent coverage required for a subject to pass the most basic requirements of WP:ANYBIO. —SerialNumber54129^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 09:03, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.