Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chad Person

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 08:21, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chad Person

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks reliable independent sources to establish notability Mccapra (talk) 07:15, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 07:28, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 07:28, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 07:28, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 07:28, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep coverage is not ideal, but I had no trouble finding and adding sources from the LA Times, Denver Post, and CBS TV Denver station. He's been covered in the press at a level that meets GNG.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 15:51, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep reviews in NYT, NYer, Art in America, LA Times. [1] --Theredproject (talk) 21:39, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per WP:HEY as the article has been significantly improved since nomination with the addition of referenced content from substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources that show that the article passes WP:GNG and deserves to be included, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 00:13, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.