Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ch Muhammed Saeed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:48, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ch Muhammed Saeed

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable businessman with no coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 18:37, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. 92.17.88.180 (talk) 18:38, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 00:55, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 00:56, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 00:56, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete No notability, promotional biography without any reference. sami ^talk 08:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete total lack of sources to pass the general notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:02, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are no minimum sources to pass WP:BIO Genome$100 (talk) 09:37, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Source searches are only providing passing mentions; does not meet WP:BASIC. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:01, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.