Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cesarina Ricci de Tingoli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep due to nominator withdrawal, improvements per HEY and refactored !vote. (non-admin closure) Goldsztajn (talk) 08:52, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cesarina Ricci de Tingoli

Cesarina Ricci de Tingoli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Currently-listed sources fail to demonstrate SIGCOV and she's only in passing mention. Grove Music is no longer online, and only 685 google results show up for Ricci. InvadingInvader (talk) 17:46, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music, and Italy. InvadingInvader (talk) 17:46, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect and Merge into Giovanni Ricci (bishop) (subject was in the family of the bishop), unless the author can bring it up standards. Not enough to stand alone. It's me... Sallicio!^{${\displaystyle \color {Red}\oplus }$} 17:54, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I would support that as well InvadingInvader (talk) 20:25, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 18:50, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Daffodil's additions to the article. It's me... Sallicio!^{${\displaystyle \color {Red}\oplus }$} 12:56, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, "Grove Music is no longer online"? What? It is literally right here. And since when is 600 google results (I got 800, by the way) not a lot? And a Baroque woman composer?... come on now. Aza24 (talk) 07:54, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Idk...but grove music showed a browser error for me when I tried to check it reminiscent of a domain not found error. I'll trust you though on that, though. InvadingInvader (talk) 18:21, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Sometimes old links to Grove are glitchy; one really has to search on the database to be sure. Aza24 (talk) 19:23, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - The Norton/Grove Dictionary of Women Composers includes an entry on her, and she is covered in other sources that I have added to the article. Her presence in the Norton/Grove dictionary meets criteria #6 for WP:COMPOSERS ("Appears at reasonable length in standard reference books on their genre of music") DaffodilOcean (talk) 09:44, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Grove entry is adequate to show probable notability alone; it has three sources listed; and as others point out there is also an entry in Norton/Grove Dictionary of Women Composers. This is a completely absurd nomination. Espresso Addict (talk) 10:12, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.