Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celerra
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 00:33, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Celerra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Please see comment by another user at Talk:Celerra. This has been in CAT:NN for 12 years, and although it exists and has minor coverage, it doesn't have the coverage or significance to meet WP:N. Boleyn (talk) 15:16, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Info - Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing.
- Logs:
2009-07 ✗ deleted
←2007-06 move to → EMC Celerra
- --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.