Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebrity Cricket League (4th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 12:32, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Celebrity Cricket League

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

CCL was started in the year 2011. But the stats show teams winning from 1986. The article is highly confusing. No Super over league were said to be conducted in CCL, but it is written Telugu team alone won 85 titles in CCL super over. Requires deletion. J.R.Kishor (talk) 04:45, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy close - no valid reason for deletion given by the nominator. Inaccurate content (if that is what the above is saying) is not grounds for deletion -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:27, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. jp×g 07:32, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. jp×g 07:32, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep not a valid rationale, WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. Notability was established in the last 2 AFDs. And in terms on cleanup, the article is looking better than it did a couple of months ago anyway, although someone does need to clarify why it has results from 1986 in the Results section, when text says it started in 2011. But that's a reason to cleanup, not to delete. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:12, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Joseph2302: - looks like there has been a deluge of vandalism recently..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:02, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Previous AfDs have shown there is plenty of coverage to pass GNG. Article may well need a clean up though. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:37, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as observed by others. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 15:46, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but can we divorce this article from the cricket project please?! StickyWicket (talk) 16:48, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The nom hasnt even given a proper reason. Some of the informations might not be accurate in the article. So this must be improved or tagged with proper templates rather than bringing into AFD. This league has plenty coverage from multiple reliable sources. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 23:33, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It does have correct maintenance tags on top of the article, in fact in March I specified in the maintenance tags what specifically needs fixing. So what we need is someone with subject interest and knowledge to sort out the mess. But deletion would be the wrong outcome. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:57, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.