Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebrity Big Brother 7 (UK)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. ---J.S ^(T/C) 03:42, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Celebrity Big Brother 7 (UK)

The article has no verifiable information that isn't already in Big Brother (UK), and everything else is unsourced speculation. _JD^talk 20:07, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - This is a confirmed future event, like a World Cup or the Olympics. Channel 4 has confirmed the show will begin in January although the article sites no resources and is mostly speculation as to the contestants. Could do with a cleanup? (Apex204 22:26, 7 December 2006 (UTC))[reply]
Weak Delete It is known that the television programme exists, but until details are released the article is otherwise mere speculation.--Anthony.bradbury 22:58, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete... although I agree with the reasons for deletion at the moment, it will be on soon. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- there will be a vast quantity of rumours about contestants etc. until final announcements are made. Even if supported by references all information posted to this page will be highly speculative. Until Ch 4 have announced specific details of the next showm this article is a minefield- huge problems with WP:OR snf WP:V.-WJBscribe ^{(WJB talk)} 00:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - Well I have edited it, made it abit more realiable with sources and more content. I will add more accurate information. It does start in a month, however similiar to what fansites do you build up a page before the big launch, that way everyone is not ramping in trying to make changes it's their. (Coreix 01:18, 09 December 2006 (UTC))[reply]
Weak keep - Following the edits to the article, including proper references, I withdraw my above opinion. It imparts information about a confirmed future event. -WJBscribe ^{(WJB talk)} 01:26, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - I am also changing from a weak delete to a weak keep for the same reasons as WJBscribe. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 02:54, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Week keep in this case, per above. In three weeks or so, the new series will start and this article will be needed. The article now contains some verifiable information such as the Big Brother eye, and the whole article is referenced as far as possible. — FireFox (talk) 17:35, 10 December 2006
Keep of course. It's a good idea to split it off the main article. It's happening so no point in deleting. --Majorly 19:50, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep per Apex204. FireSpike Editor Review! 00:16, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Apex204 - agree it needs a cleanup and perhaps some stronger referencing but I don't feel it breaches wiki policy particularly in comparison to future sporting events or similar where speculation on participants and winners is commonplace and generally agreed to be acceptable. --86.27.48.237 22:38, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.