Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caterina demarco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 19:40, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Caterina demarco

does not meet notability guidelines Cricketgirl 17:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete seems to be a hoax. Nothing on Google, which is amazing for a supposed youtube celebrity, especially one who got a recording contract: if that were true it would be making news all over the internet. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:30, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 15:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete, fails WP:ATT, WP:NN, WP:HOAX, and WP:BULLSHIT. There are zero Google hits for this person except for this article and Wiki mirrors. She doesn't appear on the artist list on her alleged record label [1], nor are their any Google hits for her alleged upcoming album. Ravenswing 16:37, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. JBEvans 18:37, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax. -FisherQueen (Talk) 18:55, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom hoax.--Paloma Walker 19:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As the great Korean War hero Colonel Sherman T. Potter would have said, "Horse hockey!" Realkyhick 01:19, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Michael 04:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.