Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catalina Guirado (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against renomination. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:58, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Catalina Guirado

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was deleted in 2017 and 2020. She does not seem to have done anything since 2010, so it is hard to imagine that there is some compelling new argument to keep this ref-bombed trivia-ridden promo piece. After this third AfD it should be salted. Edwardx (talk) 19:18, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, Fashion, England, and New Zealand. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:24, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:07, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only 4 pages of sources in GNews, all from unreliable sources as the Sun, Daily Mail and Mirror. Tabloids. Oaktree b (talk) 20:24, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guirado was, in actuality, an influential figure during the 90s-00s. She was considered to be big news during the time as a mega reality TV star, being featured in magazines, news articles, talk shows and most notably the reality shows she was known for. Her widespread attention is undeniable, and despite her move to other projects from the 2010s onwards, there still is a plethora of proof to illustrate her dominance in the TV scene during her time period. If you don't believe me, check the ref-bomb. Cleanup, sure. It needs one. But deletion is a step too far. ChefExists (talk) 20:42, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment ChefExists, as this article is almost entirely your work, perhaps you might consider cleaning it up. Otherwise, there is every chance that it will be deleted in seven days. Of course, it may well be deleted in any event. Edwardx (talk) 21:14, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Edwardx, given that this article has scarcely changed from the day it was reopened over a year ago, I do question as to why (if it needs a cleanup) it was allowed to be opened in the first place. Regardless, I'm not made of time and the prospect that my work may just be wiped either way isn't particularly motivating me, however if I do find any stimuli I may do as suggested. ChefExists (talk) 21:22, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Seems notable, but the sources are not quite up to snuff and neither is the article. Lot's of trimming, copyediting, and sourcing needed. Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 22:54, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:ENT/WP:BASIC - I found sources that include discussion of her role on I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out Of Here: BBC 2003, Guardian 2003, Guardian 2003, Independent 2003, BBC 2003 (about her eviction from the show, describing her as "the former TFI Friday star"), and a mention of her as a model and brief content about her as a singer (Guardian, 1999). Getty has also found her worthy of notice, e.g. 1, 2, 3, due to her TFI Friday role and Penthouse modeling. She was the cover model when Penthouse made an editorial shift, per Getty and the Independent (1997, also noting she "stars in TFI Friday"). The Telegraph (2003) also discusses her role on TFI Friday. Beccaynr (talk) 00:00, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:49, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:44, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:GNG, not shown to be notable. impossibly badly referenced, with IMDB, YouTube, and images of magazine covers, this is pure cruft. WP:ADMASQ 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:23, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.