Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castle Placement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:05, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Castle Placement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This organization would appear to fail the WP:CORPDEPTH test for notability. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and Securities Investor Protection Corporation registration does not assist an assertion of notability: as far as I can see, registration with those authorities is no more than a mandatory requirement in the field on investment banking in the US.
WP:BEFORE done and the {{Find sources AFD}} template that will be included with this WP:AfD will yield only the company's website, press releases, and routine mentions on LinkedIn (that could be for any company, no matter of size or importance) and similar websites. Again, none of these assist an assertion of notability.
As always, more than happy to be proven wrong. Pete AU aka Shirt58 (talk) 11:01, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:49, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:49, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Previous article instances have been deleted via WP:PROD so WP:SOFTDELETE probably isn't appropriate this time. As it stands the article describes the company's operating field and sponsorship of a start-up contest, neither inherently notable. Searches are finding mention of the firm relative to project fundraising, confirming it as a company going about its business, but I am not seeing the level of specific coverage needed for WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 08:00, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.