Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castle Gnome

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Stefan Roloff. Should the artist's article be put up be deleted, this redirect can be deleted too. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:29, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Castle Gnome

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an article about a virtual art project in Germany. I cannot find any references to the project in the German media. From the links given: one article in a Spanish newspaper discusses the project [1], and a German gallery page describes it [2]. I believe this Wikipedia article might be part of the project. In any event, the project does not appear to be not notable. AxelBoldt (talk) 16:44, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Stefan Roloff. Yes, the article is part of the project; see the row of links at the bottom of the project page (looped video with sound), and note how the text there indicates why the article has a paragraph on the "Nobody intends to build a wall" statement. This is the appropriate gallery link. In addition to the Spanish-language links provided, I found this, but the German-language links in the article are just about the square and the project does not appear to have achieved sufficient coverage to justify a freestanding article. (It also needs to be summarized more clearly with a link to Stadtschloss, Berlin). Yngvadottir (talk) 03:28, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think merging is a good solution. AxelBoldt (talk) 16:07, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:40, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 16:15, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the external links being used as sources are not enough to show that this art project has any sort of notability. I don't know if Merging to the artist's page is a great idea, because looking at it, I have some notability concerns for the artist himself, seeing as how the only reference on that page is a dead link. Rorshacma (talk) 18:57, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.