Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Case Notes (radio show)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of BBC Radio 4 programmes. (non-admin closure) TheChronium 06:59, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Case Notes (radio show) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. There are some trivial mentions in a few sources, and there appears to be a couple of Google Scholar articles that from what I can tell mostly mention the podcast in passing. I don't think there are enough sources with more than a trivial mention that demonstrate significant coverage. TipsyElephant (talk) 01:13, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:10, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:10, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 01:16, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Per WP:RPRGM, "Generally, an individual radio or television program is likely to be notable if it airs on a network of radio or television stations (either national or regional in scope), or on a cable television channel with a broad regional or national audience." The BBC broadcasts this on its national network and the programme is long-standing, having been broadcast for over twenty years. And there is naturally regular coverage in medical journals such as the BMJ and Nursing Standard. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:31, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • WP:RPRGM also says "the presence or absence of reliable sources is more definitive than the geographic range of the program's audience alone." and so far no one has linked to reliable sources that would demonstrate notability. TipsyElephant (talk) 12:42, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.