Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carsten Haitzler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Mango juice^talk 20:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Carsten Haitzler

Non-notable THB 00:39, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:BIO. Tarret 01:04, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~~Comment~~ Keep. Rasterman is well known by *nix users and throws up a lot of googe hits (although many tend to be forum and mailing list entries). Article would need more content than his enlightenment contribution, however, otherwise this is simply covered in the enlightenment article. --Bcsr4ever 01:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"a lot"? Assuming there's only one Carsten Haitzler, he has some 53,200 hits.--Chealer 02:11, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My point was more that Rasterman (who is well known in the *nix community) gets more hits than Carsten Haitzler (a name I didn't even recognize). I'm otherwise indifferent about the deletion, although it appears that others with less google hits have WP entries. But the article as it stands doesn't really give any additional information, and so is pointless. --Bcsr4ever 10:00, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Changing to Keep. Article needs more work and content, but he is more notable in his contribution to humanity than Squilliam Fancyson. --Bcsr4ever 02:41, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination.--Chealer 02:11, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Rasterman is a kind of legend among the Open Source Linux Community. The Enlihtenment project stands out in the Window Managers, the bridge between fluxbox (minimal) and KDE/GNOME (pachydermic). Federico Pistono ✆ ✍ 07:02, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is a redirect from Rasterman

AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, —Xyrael / 13:15, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT!?!?--Drahcir^{my talk} 19:46, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep comments relevant. --Nishkid64 19:54, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.