The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete (unanimous).--Scimitarparley 19:44, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nonsense--MONGO 03:07, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not encyclopedic--Mrmooky 14:19, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, obviously not an article. Too bad there's no good way to speedy this. Friday(talk) 16:40, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, although I'm glad the author had such a nice time. CLW 22:23, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
