Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlito Ostria

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:49, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Carlito Ostria

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason

Delete: Does not satisfy WP:BIO or WP:NOTABILITY. Not even clear to nominator what this person is purported to do. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 13:44, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No present indication of notability. Polargeo (talk) 15:39, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - almost certainly not notable enough for a BLP. A quick search for sources turns up nil. In addition, I removed a bit of unsourced highly negative information about him. The Wordsmith^Communicate 17:41, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. His claim to notability is in the last paragraph - he is President of Touchlife Ministries International in the Philippines. As such, he has a biography on the ministry's website. StAnselm (talk) 23:14, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable enough to deserve an article. User234 (talk) 15:23, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep -- I find it difficult to judge notability. However his organisation is engaged in 15 different areas of ministry in the Philipines; I would have thought that made Touchlife Ministries International notable, and with that its president. However, I would be happier of the organisation had an article first. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:59, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.